Wednesday, August 6, 2014

#WHYSPORTSMATTERS by Jeff Hwang.

Amidst the drama surrounding last month's takeover bid for Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) , Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSK  ) took some time out to do a little business.
Yesterday, the nation's largest cable operator announced a multi-year deal with the National Basketball Association to carry NBA TV. Starting next month, it will offer the 24-hour channel to its 21 million-plus customers, as well as NBA highlight packages as part of its video-on-demand service.
For Comcast, the benefits are twofold. First, NBA TV will help it compete with satellite providers EchoStar (Nasdaq: DISH  ) and DirecTV, both of which already carry the channel. Second, it adds video-on-demand content as well as HDTV programming. The search for content is a main driver behind Comcast's bid for Disney and ESPN, one of Disney's most valued assets.
Bigger picture, the deal further highlights the role of sports content in television. Just this week, in a dispute with Viacom (NYSE: VIA  ) over rate hikes, EchoStar pulled Viacom stations off the air. Since Viacom owns CBS, EchoStar was effectively threatening to deprive millions of college hoops fans of NCAA's March Madness -- something that benefits neither company (much less their customers).
Bigger picture still is the increasing role sports content plays in the general media. Sirius Satellite Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) is also turning to sports, hoping that content deals with the NHL and NFL, among others, will help differentiate it from larger and healthier XM Satellite Radio (Nasdaq: XMSR  ) .
Whether any of this pays off in the end remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: If content is king, sports clearly has the ear of the court.


Monday, August 4, 2014

#HOWTOBELIKEABILLIONARE by Brian Richards.



Warren Buffett's philanthropy is well-publicized; the man will end up giving away nearly 99% of his wealth to charity.
As I've written before, Buffett's charitable pledge is larger than the sum total, in inflation-adjusted terms, of the donations made by Carnegie and Rockefeller combined. In a word: Wow.
Millionaires making good
But while Buffett is an extreme example of philanthropy, he's not alone.
The always interesting Conde Nast Portfolio recently published its "Generosity Index," a list of the 50 most generous U.S. philanthropists. The list is like a who's-who of Corporate America success stories. Take a look at some of them:
DonorBusiness(es) That Made Them Wealthy
Warren BuffettBerkshire Hathaway
Bill GatesMicrosoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  )
Eli BroadKB Home (NYSE: KBH  ) , SunAmerica / AIG (NYSE: AIG  )
Pierre OmidyareBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  )
Michael DellDell (Nasdaq: DELL  )
Dan DuncanEnterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD  )
Sheldon AdelsonLas Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  )
Source: The Conde Nast Portfolio Generosity Index, November 2008 issue.
All of these people (1) created lasting businesses, (2) owned substantial portions of those businesses, and (3) donated large sums of their wealth for philanthropic purposes. (The table should also tell you that insider ownership is very, very important in small companies.)
Don't roll your eyes yet
Let me point out the obvious here: Of course these are the most generous donors in America ... they have the most money to give away!
So, to recap: Vast philanthropic donations require vast sums of wealth.
That statement's not as useless as it may seem. In fact, according to a 2007 article featured in Portfolio, "People do give more when they become richer ... but people also grow wealthier when they give more."
Giving money makes you money?
Portfolio chronicled an eye-opening study, the conclusion of which seems counterintuitive: Giving makes you wealthy.
The study, from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey, looked at philanthropic behaviors and household income, factoring in age, religion, education, race, and other such factors.
While a higher income resulted in higher charitable donations, "more giving doesn't just correlate to higher income; it causes higher income." [Emphasis mine.]
The path to prosperity
The brief explanation for why this happens is that giving "stimulates prosperity," but that sounds too vague to be useful. So, let me offer a more detailed armchair hypothesis.
You see, giving is emblematic of other personality traits that allow givers to get ahead. In particular:
  1. Givers are smarter with their money than non-givers. Donating to charity demonstrates knowledge and confidence about one's personal financial situation and, more specifically, shows a level of tax smarts. That undoubtedly explains some of why the billionaires in the above list are so generous.
  2. Givers tend to be generous in other aspects of their life. It's not a stretch to conclude that generosity would be a trait that employers and colleagues find desirable, and that that could result in higher overall pay and success generally.
What you can do today
Giving makes you wealthy. That's a powerful conclusion, and it's one we're paying close attention to at Foolanthropy, The Motley Fool's philanthropic campaign.
Aligning our charitable efforts with our core philosophy -- that with the right tools and information, every American can take control of their financial destiny and make sound decisions with their money -- Foolanthropy is focused on curing financial illiteracy among the young, the poor, and the needy.
This year we have partnered with a tremendous organization called DonorsChoose. I encourage you to read about our mission to eradicate financial illiteracy, and I also strongly encourage you to donate -- not only will you get the intangible value of having done some good, you'll get a heckuva tax break (no doubt a key motivation for billionaires' generosity).
Who knows -- perhaps giving will even stimulate prosperity in your own life.


Sunday, August 3, 2014

#HOWBILLGATESWANTSTOREADYOURMIND By Jack Uldrich



A computer capable of reading your mind may sound like science fiction, but it's rapidly becoming reality. Researchers at Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) are now using relatively inexpensive electroencephalography (EEG) caps to measure the brain's electrical activity, then applying sophisticated algorithms to decipher this data into something meaningful enough for a computer to use.
The list of possible applications is almost endless. Sony (NYSE: SNE  ) has already patented a similar application, hoping to provide an enhanced experience for video gamers. I'm sure that Microsoft is interested in doing likewise, to keep future versions of its Xbox competitive with Sony's PlayStation and future iterations of the Nintendo (OTCBB: NTDOY.PK) Wii.
Longer-term, such a technology might be able to simplify our interactions with computers. For example, it's been suggested that by measuring a person's concentration level, a computer could tell whether its user was confused and needed assistance. (Hopefully not from anything so annoying as Microsoft's notorious animated paper clip.)
The technology might also help a variety of household items. For instance, if pressing a button on a TV remote is too taxing for the average citizens of the future, they could merely think their way across the spectrum of channels. I just hope my two kids never get their hands on such technology -- the fights over what they want to watch would be horrendous.
Mind-reading technology could also complement advances in robotics. Researchers at the University of Washington, right in Microsoft's backyard, have already demonstrated that they can rudimentally control a robot by thought alone. Bill Gates has made no secret of his intention to make his company a major player in robotics, and if his software can be used to make iRobot's (Nasdaq: IRBT  ) Roomba (or any other robot, for that matter) more flexible and adaptable to its user's needs, the possibilities could be pretty exciting. If nothing else, this new technology should give Microsoft investors some interesting food for thought.

Friday, August 1, 2014

#HOWTOBECOMEABILLIONAIRE by Tim Hanson.



Every year, Forbes releases its list of the 400 richest Americans. The year's list was particularly notable, because you had to be at least a billionaire to be included.
As you might expect, a significant number of the folks on the list made their fortunes by investing. That subset includes Warren Buffett (worth $50 billion), Carl Icahn (worth $12 billion), and Jim Simons (worth $7 billion).
So here's important lesson No. 1: You can make a lot of money if you learn to manage your portfolio like a pro.
Easier said than done ...
Of course, that collection of billionaire investors offers no clue regarding what strategy is most likely to make you a billionaire. Warren Buffett is a dyed-in-the-wool value investor. That strategy has helped him achieve annual returns greater than 20% for more than 40 years on the back of investments in boring companies with competitive advantages at value prices, such as GEICO and Washington Post. That investment tack continues in his company's portfolio today, with Tyco (NYSE: TYC  ) , Costco (Nasdaq: COST  ) , and CarMax (NYSE: KMX  ) among the company's current holdings.
Jim Simons, though, can point to greater than 34% annualized returns at his Medallion fund since 1982, net of what are believed to be some incredibly stiff fees -- though I've heard rumors that this has been a very tough year for Renaissance. He favors a mechanical strategy based on computer models that are constantly refined by an army of Ph.D.s.
So while there is no best strategy, important lesson No. 2 is obvious: You gotta dance with the one that brung ya.
Say what?
Colloquialisms aside, all of these investors are astoundingly successful because they've figured out how they make money best, stuck with their strategy in good times and bad, and refined their best practices over time.
Buffett was mocked during the technology bubble when companies that he avoided and professed not to understand as well as others, such as eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) , were zooming to the moon. But they've come back to earth, and Buffett's still doing just fine today.
Icahn has a reputation as a corporate raider; he's made a lot of money instituting changes at underperforming companies. Although Icahn's recent efforts at Lear (NYSE: LEA  ) and Biogen Idec (Nasdaq: BIIB  ) did not end as well as he must have hoped, don't expect him to go soft. He's worth $12 billion. Why mess with success?
And Simons doesn't try to analyze businesses as Buffett does, because that's not where his expertise lies.
Mimic the masters
The secret to successful investing, then, is not found in any single strategy, but rather in picking the strategy that's right for you and executing it faithfully. As lauded NYU finance professor Aswath Damodaran writes in his book Investment Fables, "Each strategy has the potential for success if it matches your risk preferences and time horizon and if you are careful about how you use it."
That's it. That's the secret. Because if you get too cute -- chasing hot sectors, buying high and selling low, and giving yourself only six months or less to master a given investment strategy -- you're simply setting yourself up for failure.

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

#WARRENBUFFETTTELLSYOUHOWTOTURN$40INTO$10MILLION By Patrick Morris


Warren Buffett is perhaps the greatest investor of all time, and he has a simple solution that could help an individual turn $40 into $10 million.
A few years ago, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) CEO and Chairman Warren Buffett spoke about one of his favorite companies, Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), and how after dividends, stock splits, and patient reinvestment, someone who bought just $40 worth of the company's stock when it went public in 1919 would now have more than $5 million.

Yet in April 2012, when the board of directors proposed a stock split of the beloved soft-drink manufacturer, that figure was updated and the company noted that original $40 would now be worth $9.8 million. A little back-of-the-envelope math of the total return of Coke since May 2012 would mean that $9.8 million is now worth about $10.8 million.
The power of patienceI know that $40 in 1919 is very different from $40 today. However, even after factoring for inflation, it turns out to be $540 in today's money. Put differently, would you rather have an Xbox One, or almost $11 million?
But the thing is, it isn't even as though an investment in Coca-Cola was a no-brainer at that point, or in the near century since then. Sugar prices were rising. World War I had just ended a year prior. The Great Depression happened a few years later. World War II resulted in sugar rationing. And there have been countless other things over the past 100 years that would cause someone to question whether their money should be in stocks, much less one of a consumer-goods company like Coca-Cola.
The dangers of timing
Yet as Buffett has noted continually, it's terribly dangerous to attempt to time the market:
"With a wonderful business, you can figure out what will happen; you can't figure out when it will happen. You don't want to focus on when, you want to focus on what. If you're right about what, you don't have to worry about when" 
So often investors are told they must attempt to time the market, and begin investing when the market is on the rise, and sell when the market is falling.
This type of technical analysis of watching stock movements and buying based on how the prices fluctuate over 200-day moving averages or other seemingly arbitrary fluctuations often receives a lot of media attention, but it has been proved to simply be no better than random chance.
Investing for the long termIndividuals need to see that investing is not like placing a wager on the 49ers to cover the spread against the Panthers, but instead it's buying a tangible piece of a business.
It is absolutely important to understand the relative price you are paying for that business, but what isn't important is attempting to understand whether you're buying in at the "right time," as that is so often just an arbitrary imagination.
In Buffett's own words, "if you're right about the business, you'll make a lot of money," so don't bother about attempting to buy stocks based on how their stock charts have looked over the past 200 days. Instead always remember that "it's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price."
How About Three Wonderful Companies?
The Economist compares this disruptive invention to the steam engine and the printing press. Business Insider says it's "the next trillion dollar industry." And everyone from BMW, to Nike, to the U.S. Air Force is already using it every day. Watch The Motley Fool's shocking video presentation today to discover the garage gadget that's putting an end to the Made In China era... and learn the investing strategy we've used to double our money on these 3 stocks. Click here to watch now!
Some bonus investing advice for 2014 
The Economist  compares this disruptive invention to the steam engine and the printing press.  Business Insider  says it's "the next trillion dollar industry." And everyone from BMW, to Nike, to the U.S. Air Force is already using it every day. Watch The Motley Fool's  shocking video presentation  today to discover the garage gadget that's putting an end to the Made In China era... and learn the investing strategy we've used to double our money on these 3 stocks.  Click here  to watch now!
$19 TRILLION INDUSTRY COULD DESTROY INTERNET
It's time to say "goodbye" to your Internet!

One bleeding-edge technology is about to put the World-Wide-Web to bed. And if you act right away, it could make you wildly rich. Experts are calling it the single largest business opportunity in the history of capitalism... The Economist is calling it "transformative"... But you’ll probably just call it "how I made my millions." 

Saturday, July 26, 2014

#THELITTLESHOPTHAT'SPUTTINGCHINAOUTOFBUSINESS.



A new store recently opened at 298 Mulberry Street in downtown Manhattan.
And if you walk in the door, you'll see something truly amazing. And I'm not just talking about the characters from Sesame Street.
Because this is something that's about to close down 112,000 Chinese factories...
... And launch a 21st-century industrial revolution right here in the U.S.A.

Jay Leno bought one and put it in his garage (but it's not a car).
So did Nike, BMW, and Disney World. And now that Sesame Street has jumped on board... your kids' dreams could come to life inside this tiny New York storefront.
But since the sticker price has recently plummeted from $100,000 to $799, it won't be long before everyone buys one.
Business Insider says it's "the next trillion dollar industry." The Economist has gone even further, comparing its history-changing impact to the steam engine and the printing press.
Too good to be true? Wall Street thinks so. Meanwhile, technology watchers are whispering that this invention could be "bigger than the internet."
See, the innovators behind the iPod, Google and Amazon.com have been big boosters all along. And you still have time to join them — if you act fast.
Because when the skeptics wise up, the big money will already be off the table.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

#JORDANLEBRONKOBESIGNONWITHNEWSPORTSBUSINESS.



Exclusive: Consulting firm Teneo has lured the three biggest basketball stars on the planet, along with golfer Graeme McDowell, to its beefed-up sports arm. Will it usher in a new era?

How do you get Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant and LeBron James to join your new sports business?
You bring on board a former Nike NKE 0.29% executive that has close, personal relationships with all three.
The business is Teneo Sports, which has existed since Teneo Inc., a global consulting firm, launched in 2011. The key executive is Charlie Denson, who worked at Nike for 34 years and was brand president from 2001 until last January, when he retired.
That retirement didn’t last long: Fortune has learned that Denson has joined Teneo Sports as its chairman; Jordan, Bryant, James and pro golfer Graeme McDowell are its first four athlete clients.
That’s a star-studded opening lineup that contains the world’s most famous living retired athlete, the NBA’s two biggest stars, and one rising-star golfer with a U.S. Open win under his belt. Two of those men landed in the top ten of our 2014 Fortunate 50 list of athlete earnings, and they compete with each other on the court, which made getting each of them on board particularly challenging. But Denson was the draw for the basketball players. McDowell, meanwhile, already had a sponsorship with Teneo, which meant placement of its name on his sleeve.
Declan Kelly and Paul Keary, both formerly of FTI Consulting, co-founded Teneo (pronounced teh-NAY-oh) in 2011 along with Doug Band, who spent a decade as an advisor to President Bill Clinton. The company provides services such as strategic communications, management consulting, investment banking and financial restructuring to a number of Fortune 100 corporations and CEOs.
Teneo has had a sports business since the beginning, but that business primarily helped cities or organizations make bids for sports events, such as the Winter Games in Vancouver in 2010 and in Sochi in 2014, both of which Teneo had a hand in. The company also has existing relationships with NASCAR and the WTA, among others. Teneo did not, previously, work with individual athletes, with the exception of McDowell and retired tennis legend Billie Jean King, who are official partners. Under Denson’s leadership, Teneo Sports will now provide athletes with a one-stop shop for their marketing and branding needs.
This is not a sports agency, though many will likely equate it with one. The athletes joining Teneo are retaining their agents, and those agents are not joining Teneo. Rather, Teneo seeks to let agents continue to manage their clients in the way they traditionally do, while Teneo will provide a wide range of business services for its athlete clients, including wealth management, tax planning, personal branding, business development and strategic partnerships. (This news comes just one month after Teneo brought on former U.S. senator George Mitchell as a senior adviser.)
The notion that is new here (or at least in keeping with current trends) is of the athlete as CEO of his or her own brand. The athlete is the content creator and the face of the brand. The agent’s role remains the same, but Teneo aims to improve on the typical model — where athletes outsource their various business needs to a range of different specialists — by giving the athlete only one call to make for any number of business needs. Teneo has partnered with a few entities for help with these functions, including Wieden and Kennedy for creative, UBS for finance, and DLA Piper, a leading sports law practice, for legal services.
This concept comes at a time when the business of athletes off the field or court is evolving. Endorsement deals are no longer simply about brands paying an athlete a fee to hawk their products (though those still exist, certainly), but more and more are about an athlete getting equity in a promising new business. Take LeBron James and Beats By Dre as the example: James signed on early, appearing in ads and using the product, not for any kind of endorsement fee but for an ownership percentage. That small stake, estimated at only one or two percent, reportedly brought James a windfall of $30 million when Beats sold to Apple last month for $3 billion. It’s what David Wright did a few years ago with Vitamin Water, and it’s what Mark Teixeira has done with Juice Press, and Vernon Davis with D1 Sports. This new model is also, experts say, a way for big brands to hedge better against the possibility of image-damaging athlete scandals.
To be sure, other big sports agencies such as IMG or Octagon — powerhouses that Teneo does not see as its competitors in this new venture — also offer services beyond mere representation, and would likely argue that Teneo is not the first to try something like this. But Teneo believes that Teneo Sports will be a game-changer, and so it will only be seeking athletes matching the caliber of its first four: a level that probably only includes some 100 stars across all the major global sports. In other words, it’s a tall order.
But the agents of at least these four stars, for starters, are fully on board. That includes big names in the representation world such as Rob Pelinka (Bryant’s agent), Rich Paul (James’s) and Colin Morrissey of Horizon (childhood friend and agent of McDowell). Maverick Carter, LeBron’s business manager and partner in LRMR Management, tells Fortune that the appeal of Teneo Sports is an additive one — it doesn’t replace what LRMR has been doing so well for years, but adds to it.
What Teneo is setting up is what I’ve always set out to do since I started working with him,” says Carter. “It’s exactly what LRMR set out to do. They’re not out to make his next McDonald’s deal and take a fee, like I do as my business, but they’ll just be additional smart, like-minded people in the room to help me think about everything I’m doing.” Carter and James created LRMR in 2004, and in 2007 they bought a stake in Cannondale Bikes; when they sold that a year later for an undisclosed profit, Carter says, “it showed everyone, whoa, this idea really works, it’s real. That wasn’t the way things were done, but it’s the way we want to do things.”
Each of the four stars is joining Teneo Sports for different reasons, and no meeting between them all was necessary, but Carter says he did speak to Bryant directly at one point during the process.
McDowell was interested because he sees a change in the accessibility of pro athletes: they are now touchable, tangible people with whom fans can engage. Due to social media, it’s more difficult for them to hide and to be private. As a result, the athlete brand has to be extremely authentic. McDowell, who has some six to eight endorsements or corporate partnerships already, including with Verizon, MasterCard, and RBC, is looking to further cement what exactly the Graeme McDowell brand stands for.
What the Teneo Sports brand will stand for is a different question. In an age when Jay Z is a bona fide sports agent building Roc Nation Sports into a legitimate player, and an age in which Brazilian soccer star Neymar Jr. foregoes a press conference after his debilitating injury and instead posts a video of himself to YouTube, the sports marketing world is open for change. As Maverick Carter puts it, “LeBron is at the size where he does need to be run like a big company, so I’m not afraid to bring more smart people on board to help me do it.”